<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding 32 and 64-bit System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.build-gaming-computer-guide.com/32-and-64-bit-system.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.build-gaming-computer-guide.com/32-and-64-bit-system.html</link>
	<description>Your Complete Guide To Build Gaming Computer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 20:41:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: comphard</title>
		<link>http://www.build-gaming-computer-guide.com/32-and-64-bit-system.html/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>comphard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.build-gaming-computer-guide.com/?p=112#comment-100</guid>
		<description>My 64-bit Windows experience was a bit buggy. This was of course because of device drivers but it seemed that the crashing was inevitable even without them.

I personally feel a bit frustrated because of the slow development of the case. 64-bit Windows has been around for years but nothing seems to be changing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 64-bit Windows experience was a bit buggy. This was of course because of device drivers but it seemed that the crashing was inevitable even without them.</p>
<p>I personally feel a bit frustrated because of the slow development of the case. 64-bit Windows has been around for years but nothing seems to be changing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: windowsxp64 user</title>
		<link>http://www.build-gaming-computer-guide.com/32-and-64-bit-system.html/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>windowsxp64 user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.build-gaming-computer-guide.com/?p=112#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Yes it is confusing, but bottom line what is mentioned above most be absulutly be concidered.

The rest fo the components must be able to move 64 bit at a time as well to to see the true performance gain.

It is the same as saying the house is a strong as it weakest brick, no program running on a 64 bit system will perform any faster unless all parts &quot;everything is from software and hardware&quot; is equaly 64 bit.

I say do not upgrade yet save your money it will not be long before a &quot;total 64 bit system&quot; is utilized, but I will by the time it is Vista 64 bit will have already become outdated, as well as it is already a pain to use now anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it is confusing, but bottom line what is mentioned above most be absulutly be concidered.</p>
<p>The rest fo the components must be able to move 64 bit at a time as well to to see the true performance gain.</p>
<p>It is the same as saying the house is a strong as it weakest brick, no program running on a 64 bit system will perform any faster unless all parts &#8220;everything is from software and hardware&#8221; is equaly 64 bit.</p>
<p>I say do not upgrade yet save your money it will not be long before a &#8220;total 64 bit system&#8221; is utilized, but I will by the time it is Vista 64 bit will have already become outdated, as well as it is already a pain to use now anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

